Giuliani's Claim: "Bogus Numbers Wrapped in an Invalid Comparison Embedded in a Smear"
And Mitt's No Better.
The above quotation is from Krugman's latest. As usual, it packs quite a punch, and points to not only Giuliani's habit of flat out lying through his teeth, but the media's refusal to focus on this...which means they're ignoring a defining charasteric of Rudy...and Mitt, for that matter:
But here’s what I don’t understand: Why isn’t Mr. Giuliani’s behavior here considered not just a case of bad policy analysis but a character issue?
For better or (mostly) for worse, political reporting is dominated by the search for the supposedly revealing incident, in which the candidate says or does something that reveals his true character. And this incident surely seems to fit the bill.
Leave aside the fact that Mr. Giuliani is simply lying about what the Democrats are proposing; after all, Mitt Romney is doing the same thing...
To be fair, there has been some news coverage of the prostate affair. But it’s only a tiny fraction of the coverage received by Hillary’s laugh and John Edwards’s haircut.
And much of the coverage seems weirdly diffident. Memo to editors: If a candidate says something completely false, it’s not "in dispute." It’s not the case that "Democrats say" they’re not advocating British-style socialized medicine; they aren’t.
The fact is that the prostate affair is part of a pattern: Mr. Giuliani has a habit of saying things, on issues that range from health care to national security, that are demonstrably untrue. And the American people have a right to know that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment